On 30 January 2014 12:02, David Faure <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday 29 January 2014 12:40:20 Thiago Macieira wrote: >> On terça-feira, 28 de janeiro de 2014 15:19:37, Andrius da Costa Ribas > wrote: >> > MSVC (at least vc2010) is C89 for C code, changing it to C99 on GCC may >> > lead to changes that break MSVC build (since almost everything is mostly >> > tested on linux/gcc only). >> >> Then make it a requirement to use MSVC 2013 at a minimum on Windows. > > I would rather we don't do that, as long as Qt itself doesn't require it. > > Surely we don't have so much C code that this really matters? >
C++11 is required, which is the default of MSVC 2013, so MSVC 2013 (free or paid editions) is required to compile C++ portions. It's unwise to require or suggest mismatched C and C++ compilers. -- Regards, Dimitri. _______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
