alohas. recently the QCA maintainer and I got into a discussion [1] whether a qca-qt5 library should be a different config inside the same cmake package or an independent one (detailed discussion in the longest comment thread of the review).
> find_package(Qca NAMES Qca-qt5 Qca-QT5 Qca-5 Qca REQUIRES) or > find_package(Qca-qt5) former is very much in line with the maintainer's expectation of how qca is supposed to have any odd suffix supplied by the distro [2] that would eventually disappear, whereas my thinking in latter is that if distros start shipping a suffixed version it is here to stay and really should not be considered a configuration within the regular QCA package. any thoughts on whether one is more desirable than the other? I am not quite sure what one would generally consider proper here. [1] https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121323/ [2] https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121168/ HS _______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
