On Thursday April 21 2016 13:18:29 René J.V. Bertin wrote: > Also see Marko's reaction below.
Could have known I'd forget to copy that if I didn't do it at once: Marko Käning wrote on 20160421::05:47:02 re: "Re: An interesting read, perhaps..." >Hi all, > >+1 from me for providing a KDE-official way of installing KF5 frameworks and >apps in a Linuxy fashion in full support of René's argumentation. > >Leaving developers and users the choice for how they want to install KDE's >ecosystem on their favorite OS is the way to go. > >Please consider his point of view. > > >Since I started to contribute to CI for KDE on OSX it was beyond me to figure >out how KDE's interlinked libs and apps would have to be isolated into >separate application bundles and still be able to supply the required >interconnectivity and overall functionality like on a Linux system. > >Having René's alternative build method in place would not only support >developers like us but allow for real CI including realistic tests. Even if >this alternative installation won't be the official one, its CI results will >be of great benefit for the KDE-approved but not testable standaloney >installations. > >From my active OSX/CI time I recall not only a few issues being caught by my >personal OSX builders. Not all those were caused by my builders being >MacPorts-based... _______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
