On Friday 16 August 2013 18:51:37 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Friday, August 16, 2013 10:49:26 Jos Poortvliet wrote: > > - Our marketing efforts of "KDE is people" has backfired, Canonical now > > thinks KDE = Aaron and Aaron = KDE ;-) > > That’s an incorrect conclusion, I fear. Canonical’s viewpoint that I somehow > steer all of KDE as some sort of benevolent dictator has nothing to do with > our marketing of “KDE is people”. I won’t get into the why’s and how’s of > that, but trust me: they are unrelated. > > I don’t want one company having arrived at the wrong conclusions some time > ago impacting what has been a very successful campaign that is not related > to that.
Sorry, the first part (connecting to our marketing efforts) of this conclusion really was meant as a joke - I agree with you that there is no relation :D > > I think Aaron already made clear that he would be happy to work on sharing > > as much as possible with the Plasma efforts he's involved in and kick folk > > around him to do the same. > > No kicking is necessary; everyone in Plasma feels this way. That’s why we > have routinely invited people from other projects (inc Canonical, btw) to > Tokamaks, why we have reached out to them on the QML and other Qt mailing > lists, why we implemented the units API, why KWin devs have been talking > with RazorQt, why when we looked at a KDM replacement we invited Canonical > (who showed up and participated very positively) as well as RazorQt, Hawaii > and others. > > I just make the wild bet that the Frameworks > > folk are perfectly > > You win the bet. That’s one of the core motivators behind the Frameworks > effort. Yay. Can I get a cookie? :P
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
