-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/28/2013 09:13 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > By accident or not, very the same week I noticed concerns (probably > from the other camp) on reddit [1] and phoronix [2] about the KDE Free > Qt Foundation. If I understood what these comments about 'killing > freedom' mean (after removing some trolling layers) more or less they > relate to: > > - Exclusiveness of the Qt Free Edition for X11 (so what about mobile > Qt? Casual reader would think there are separate codebases for > different Qt targets) > - Exclusiveness of the protection to KDE (may be a misconception that > the foundation equals KDE? BSD or other licenses are not KDE-exclusive > otherwise wouldn't be approved by OSI) > > I'd like to ask about comments, explanation, especially that these > comments stay not answered. Hi,
I replied to the reddit thread. Mirko. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlIe8jwACgkQYSSaITCTnKWMwgCgrUV9LZUMjZYgUfJXR0vGR7TH Sp0AnRL7m4ZxrUWwZMzEUdR2ftLHytlL =XARs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
