On Thursday 16 January 2014 14:48:22 Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Thursday 16 January 2014 13:24:51 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > Martin Graesslin wrote: 'We all know Albert and we all know that his > > writing reads more harsh than he intents to.’ IOW: it’s OK for Albert, > > because we all know he’s gruff and we should accommodate that. Others are > > routinely granted clemency for one reason or another, but should I not > > respond in perfect pitch to every email I get a different response. > > Aaron, in my first reply to your sub-thread I asked you to assume good > intentions. My mail was obviously also intended to be a note to Albert that > his comment was way too harsh and out of line. There was no reason to turn > this so negative. I'm disappointed and it hurts to read that friends are > accusing me of having double standards.
Threading is done in such a way that I pretty much read it like Aaron to be honest. So your intent was maybe... not that obvious. ;-) Aren't mailing lists great? Not really no... Cheers. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list kde-community@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
