On Tuesday, 2014-08-26, 12:02:27, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 21.23:54 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > For instance, Kevin Krammer's example of having a mean of > > contacting largely for gauging the need of a scripting BoF is spot on. I > > hope it won't get to that point, but k-c-d would still have value if it > > was > > the only kind of traffic on it. > > How is a pan-KDE scripting BoF not a frameworks topic? It is mostly an application development topic, it becomes a frameworks topic if there is a need to create a framework for sharing stuff. In this specific case that's true, but not necessarily always. Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list kde-community@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
