Hi, On 19 August 2015 at 11:16, Martin Graesslin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 08:10:25 PM John Layt wrote: >> * That while not ideal, it is pragmatic to mirror our code on Github >> as it could increase visibility and may help attract new developers or >> at least new users for Frameworks. >> * That we should do it in a co-ordinated, consistent, automated, >> officially sanctioned way as part of our infrastructure before others >> do it in an informal, inconsistent sub-standard way that might even >> accidentally breach their manifesto undertakings. >> * That it should be a one-way mirror by default, with issues and pull >> requests disabled. >> * That individual apps can choose to 'accept' pull requests via >> Github, but any patches have to be applied through the normal KDE >> infrastructure(using a standard documented method?). >> * That individual apps can choose to opt out entirely. >> * That all repos mirrored must have a standard README.md file that >> states the correct procedure for submitting bugs and patches. >> * That we probably shouldn't 'bless' Github as the only place we >> mirror our code but could mirror more widely
Should have seen this thread earlier, sorry for the late input. I'll +1 this, if not for anything else but the fact that there will be mirrors of the source on-line in multiple places should the KDE repositories ever go down en-masse. -- Boudhayan Gupta _______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
