On Saturday, September 19, 2015 02:12:13 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > I would prefer us to be more pragmatic. If an adequate free-software > > tool exists, lets try to use it. If a proprietary tool provides a > > better experience lets use that. For my own projects I will advocate > > reviewboard/phabricator, but I'm comfortable excepting a fly-by patch > > on github. Specially since they provide a simple web-UI for making > > changes. > > Bollocks, github is awful to use, it took me like 15 minutes to learn how > to submit a patch, just because you're used to it doesn't mean it's > easier.
It depends where other people are! If a developer has a small fix to propose, and can just hack it through and use a known account and a familiar interface, so be it... github's interface is not magical just like KDE's one is not. ;-) A big +1 with letting KDE projects free to experiment whatever (complimentary) tools they like best. Bye, -Riccardo _______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
