On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Laszlo Papp <[email protected]> wrote: >> No I'm not. >> >> Boud, you're shipping Krita on Windows. You're uploading them on the >> KDE official website, you're thereby making me pay for Windows if I >> want to test it and contribute to the project, you are making >> decisions for others. >> >> Does this argument really hold? > > I must admit that you have a valid point in there with Windows being a > bit different. > > On the other hand, Windows plays a significant role in the world for end > users. >
For frameworks, then end users are developers. Github plays a significant role in that world. > Is github really comparable to it? My humble guess would be that > github is less prevalent for our end users. Even for development, it > does not seem to be crucial at this point in time, at least, I > believe. I really hope that it will remain this way and KDE can be a > good factor to challenge things with github with open alternatives. And we should continue challenging them, however, just like we still ship binaries on Windows. I would argue that we need a presence on GitHub as well. -- Vishesh Handa _______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
