El Dissabte, 19 de setembre de 2015, a les 16:23:26, Teo Mrnjavac va escriure: > On Saturday, September 19, 2015 13:04:55 David Edmundson wrote: > > > > I was under the impression they were disabled by the options we had > > > > selected. Unfortunately that is not the case. > > > > > > Thanks for clarifying on this. > > > > > > I hope they can still be disabled. > > > > > > They can't. I had spent some time looking before. Sorry. > > > > However, we have solid hard data that it's a non-issue. > > > > Gnome has been mirrored on github for nearly 2 years, in that time GTK has > > had a grand total of 4 pull requests over time. > > Most others (gedit, cheese, epiphany) have had 0. > > > > Interestingly they have had literally hundreds of github "forks", which > > implies it has led to sustantiable numbers of patches back using the > > traditional methods > > > > I've made a wiki page, which says how to turn a pull request into a > > reviewboard submission. > > https://techbase.kde.org/Development/GithubMirror > > > > If we get any questions we can then just copy and paste that, and don't > > need to spend any time explaining. Bam, done. > > Thank you David, for your get-things-done approach in this controversial and > tense situation. It is really much easier to solve than it seems from all > these threads. > > I'm personally in favor of letting projects decide whether to allow GitHub > pull requests or not, but regardless of the final decision it is good to > already have practical solutions like this techbase entry. > > I find it unfortunate that some long time KDE contributors feel that KDE > goals are threatened by all this. I understand their concerns, but I assign > those concerns a different priority score. In fact, the inflexible policy > towards 3rd party (including proprietary) infrastructure and processes we > have in KDE deters me from bringing some of my own (currently > GitHub-hosted) work under the KDE umbrella, as this would hinder some very > productive working relationships with our downstreams and potentially > result in *less* free open source software being produced, deployed and > used.
That's something you have convinced yourself about, you don't have proof. Cheers, Albert _______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
