On Sunday 27 September 2015 08:25:49 Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]> wrote: > > El Divendres, 25 de setembre de 2015, a les 13:16:46, Jaroslaw Staniek va > > > e.g. Gitlab? > > > > AFAIR last time we tried gitlab it crawled under "KDE size" scenario, so > > unless it has improved it would not work with KDE + more stuff. > > Gitlab itself crawled due to the way it handled groups - it simply > wasn't designed to handle a single group containing KDE's ~2000 > developers. It also had some fundamental issues with how repositories > got moved around - so if a repository was moved from a user's personal > namespace to the shared KDE namespace, every single KDE developer > would get spammed about this. > > Sysadmin also had some concerns regarding the integrity of the > codebase (which was what really killed it).
And that's not even considering that the review tools of GitLab are really not great. They might have improved the last time I tried, but other options did a much better job. Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
