On Sonntag, 24. Januar 2016 10:15:37 CET Ivan Čukić wrote: > > I'd go with LGPL+exception. It's effectively the same as GPL+exception in > > this context but shows the intent of providing a library. If someone ever > > I have never seen a project under LGPL+exception, that is the reason I > wrote GPL+exception. For me, it is the same, but I agree it would be > more obvious to the client if 'L' was added. > > Now, the main problem here is that (L)GPL+exception is not on the list > of approved licenses for our code. :
Eigen is a header-only library that used to be LGPL. I recommand you have a look at their Licensing FAQ from the time: http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=Licensing_FAQ&oldid=1116 _______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list kde-community@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
