Luigi Toscano ha scritto: > On Monday, 12 December 2016 13:25:55 CET Boudewijn Rempt wrote: >> On Mon, 12 Dec 2016, Martin Gräßlin wrote: >>> No, that would affect more. For example when looking for a bug report I go >>> to bugs.kde.org, Browse, kwin, component and then have a very small list >>> of the bugs for that component and can find the bug report. >>> >>> If all the nonsentical needsinfo bugs get in there and are not hidden by >>> default, it gets completely useless. >>> >>> Also I don't want to be at 1000 open bug reports in a year. Consider the >>> social impact of that if weekly-bug-summary stats include those bugs. >> >> Fortunately, in that case, the weekly info page has disappeared from >> the front page... But yes, needinfo is a category that applies to a bug, >> it isn't just "I have a question for this person who reported or commented >> on this bug" -- it's this bug report is useless without further info. >> >> Now, if the status automatically changed back if info was added, that would >> be a nice improvement. > > So if the weekly status page was filter out the bugs in needinfo state, would > that be enough? > When the target of the needinfo answer, the needinfo flag is cleared (unless > a > checkbox is unchecked, this can be configured). The needinfo flag could be > cleaned also if another person answers (not enabled by default).
Confirmed (thanks Ben): we can change it, it's a custom page: https://cgit.kde.org/websites/bugs-kde-org.git/tree/weekly-bug-summary.cgi?h=kde-5.0 -- Luigi
