On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Shubhi Gautam <[email protected]> wrote: > please unsubscribe me from this list. > Not sure how i was subscribed
You've been unsubscribed. As this list does not accept anything other that double confirmed opt-in subscriptions for joining the list, you must have subscribed to the list. Regards, Ben Cooksley KDE Sysadmin > > > On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Valorie Zimmerman > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'm writing at the request of the sysadmins, who would like to hear >> from the community about distributions' use of KDE infra. >> >> I'm part of the Kubuntu community and will use it as the example I know >> best. >> >> Kubuntu has some KDE wiki pages, found at >> https://community.kde.org/Kubuntu - for which we are very grateful. >> Ubuntu has a wiki we used to use, but between the awfulness of >> MoinMoin and the spam attacks on it, we love being at home at the KDE >> wikis. >> >> For some time we've been using notes.kde.org as well, and are planning >> how to use share.kde.org now that notes is closing down. We'll need to >> set up a Kubuntu group so that all Kubuntu team members who need >> access can actually access the shares. One of the advantages of using >> KDE infra over piratepad or so, is that we can add a password if >> necessary, and share among other KDE packagers if necessary. >> >> We are also interested in having a Phab instance for Kubuntu mostly >> for the todo/workboard. Right now, we're using Trello, but would >> prefer to use Free software if possible. And the beauty of Phabricator >> is that we can keep more of our "stuff" in one place. For instance, it >> includes a wiki as well, which we might use for packaging >> documentation. Very slick to have all our packaging stuff in one >> place. >> >> However, the sysadmins would like the KDE community support for this, >> since it could be seen as a "slippery slope." In addition, Ben >> Cooksley said, "we'll need to come up with some guidelines surrounding >> what distributions can ask us for, given the Manifesto / KDE Project >> rules. >> >> I would love to see more KDE distros getting cozy with the KDE >> community because I don't like to see fighting between packagers and >> developers, and communication is key. >> >> Our Manifesto [1] says: Being part of the international KDE community >> conveys certain benefits: ....Make use of KDE infrastructure for >> project hosting. I've noticed that some KDE projects do not use KDE >> infra, such as bugzilla, websites, and even mail lists. I thought the >> rule was that all KDE projects would move to KDE infra, so this >> surprised me. >> >> On the other hand, groups which are associated with the community but >> will never be "KDE projects" such as KDE distros, are not mentioned in >> the Manifesto. We do already host the KDE Packagers list [2], and >> Distributions list [3] which supports the Distribution Outreach >> Program [4]. >> >> What do you say? Obviously we want to support KDE distributions. Where >> do we draw the line? >> >> Valorie >> >> 1. https://manifesto.kde.org/benefits.html >> 2. https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-distro-packagers >> 3. https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/distributions >> 4. >> https://dot.kde.org/2016/03/03/announcing-kde-communitys-distribution-outreach-program >> >> -- >> http://about.me/valoriez > >
