On Wednesday, 6 September 2017 11:04:59 CEST Agustin Benito (toscalix) wrote: > Hi, > > what aboutextending the goal to embedded devices assuming mobile and > embedded are not much different?
I can see embedded, say for IVI, piggy-backing off of mobile. If we take into account the particularities of IVI systems now (of which Agustin knows a lot and can help developers incorporate into their apps), we will have yet another market we can attack with little overhead. We'll have the platform and the apps to go with it. > > Best Regards > Agustin Benito (toscalix) > KDE eV member > Profile: http://es.linkedin.com/in/toscalix > > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2017 M09 5, Tue 01:26:44 CEST Aleix Pol wrote: > > ... > > > >> That said, I think it's also worth including here other major mobile > >> platforms. I'm convinced that the appeal to make an application mobile > >> is magnitudes greater if the application will work on other platforms > >> besides our own. > > > > +1 > > I think also the barrier to entry is much lower if the first step can be > > to > > just get your own KDE-based app running on Android, without having to > > switch your phone to a whole different OS. > > Actually, when talking about mobile, I wouldn't mind limiting "on other > > platfoms" to "Android" > > > > Alex -- Promotion & Communication www: http://kde.org Mastodon: https://mastodon.technology/@kde Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/kde/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/kdecommunity
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
