Thanks Lydia for getting this moving again! On Monday, 2 April 2018 22:56:31 CEST Lydia Pintscher wrote: > Hey Jaroslaw :) > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 10:28 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek <stan...@kde.org> wrote: > > Thanks for reminding me Lydia > > > > I've not forgotten this. While there's progress I do still see this as a > > pilot stage and do not think we're in a hurry given telemetry is something > > "extra" for a project development, not a core feature of any product. > > We are in a hurry now. We're waiting for projects to be able to start > using it and get us valuable insights about how our software is used. > We've been on it since last Akademy. Let's get it finished :) > > > Below I am referring to this version: > > https://community.kde.org/index.php?title=Policies/Telemetry_Policy&oldid= > > 78057 > > > > tl;dr: Why discussing: Any deep change and limitation to projects' freedom > > needs to bring substantial benefits over drawbacks. Level of complexity of > > the contract for a project or individual developer needs to be balanced by > > real (not hypothetical) benefits. > > The benefits here for KDE are: > * we have a better understanding of our userbase leading hopefully to > better software > * we have a better understanding of our userbase leading hopefully to > better marketing > * we have a clear policy we can point our users to that explains how > we are handling their data and that is in line with our vision/what we > stand for. > > > I've studied the wiki page more in depth and I have these points where I'd > > like to see improvement. This is based on my experience, not a list of > > quick ideas. > > > > https://community.kde.org/Talk:Policies/Telemetry_Policy# > > Thank you! Volker is probably best equipped to answer these.
I've commented on all points on the talk page now I think. Regards, Volker
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.