Sorry, I don't have better suggestions. Naming things is a hard problem
in bug science.
Ilmari
Andrew Crouthamel kirjoitti 5.9.2018 klo 11.17:
I like REPORTED as well. That leaves timeframe out of the status name.
Bugs can stay REPORTED but never CONFIRMED, and that all makes sense.
Based on David's feedback, this would work for his needs I believe.
As for WONTFIX vs. ASDESIGNED, Ilmari, do you have any suggestions for
alternatives? I know that isn't perfect, but was the best we could come
up with so far.
Andrew Crouthamel
-------- Original Message --------
On Sep 5, 2018, 12:03 AM, Nate Graham < n...@kde.org> wrote:
On 09/04/2018 10:01 PM, Christoph Feck wrote:
> I still oppose to name a status NEW (again). It only attracts
"how is
> this NEW? this is already [random timespan here] OLD!" comments.
> There will always be products/components that have no active
maintainer
> to look for bugs in a limited timeframe.
>
> My suggestions are OPEN, REPORTED, or UNRESOLVED.
I could get behind OPEN or REPORTED.
Nate
