I like OPENED as well. -------- Original Message -------- On Sep 29, 2018, 6:17 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 9:44 AM Valorie Zimmerman > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 1:48 AM Luigi Toscano <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Kai Uwe Broulik ha scritto: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > > Here is my follow-up change recommendation based on feedback and >>> > > research: >>> > > >>> > > UNCONFIRMED -> REPORTED >>> > > WONTFIX -> INTENTIONAL >>> > > INVALID -> NOTABUG >>> > >>> > one issue I'm having with "REPORTED" is that it shows up as "REPO" in the >>> > list >>> > and can easily be confused with "REOP" for "REOPENED". Perhaps we need >>> > something different for Reopened then. >>> >>> If we rename also that, we would have two bug names diverging from the other >>> bug trackers, instead of just one. Moreover I find that there is no much to >>> discuss on the appropriateness of REOPENED. >>> I'd rather find an alternative for REPORTED, if this confusion is going to >>> be >>> an issue. >>> >>> -- >>> Luigi >> >> >> OPENED ? > > Definitionally reported is definitely the right word to be using, but > given that conflict/simiilarity between REPO/REOP I think opened is > probably the best term we can get here. > None of the synonyms for reported fit that's for sure. > >> >> Valorie >> -- >> http://about.me/valoriez >> >> > > Cheers, > Ben
