On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 1:12 AM Myriam Schweingruber <myr...@kde.org> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 14:22, Harald Sitter <sit...@kde.org> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 2:16 PM Boudewijn Rempt <b...@valdyas.org> wrote: >> > >> > On vrijdag 16 november 2018 14:11:29 CET Harald Sitter wrote: >> > >> > > - human sets needsinfo >> > > - 15 days pass: bot posts reminder >> > > - reporter comments >> > > - N days pass: bug gets automatically dropped back to whatever the >> > > previous state was? >> > >> > Yes, that would be perfect! As far as I'm concerned, N can be 0 or 1. >> >> Cool. Should be easy to do. >> >> Any disagreements from the rest of the community? >> >> TLDR: if the original reporter comments on a needsinfo bug it gets >> automatically switched back to whatever the state before needsinfo was > > > It slightly disturbs my triaging routine, as I routinely check the NEEDSINFO > I set within a month (and I have saved searches for this), so could "my" bugs > be excluded, please? It is a really short time span, I always consider people > to be away for longer than just two weeks (holidays, etc) which is very often > the case. Some bug reports do answer on a regular basis, just noth within 2 > weeks in all cases.
This is about the original NEEDSINFO discussion, not related to the question I posed, is it? If the timing seems unsuitable I'd like changing it discussed within the bug squad. I am just the code monkey, in that capacity I'd like to avoid a wall of conditions for every person doing bug triage. HS
