I think they're one and the same. All intellectual property the rights to which have been waived = CC0 = public domain. There are a few European exceptions to copyright expiration, such as https://creativecommons.org/2016/04/26/long-arm-copyright-millions-blocked-reading-original-versions-diary-anne-frank/ that I don't think concern CC0.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 3:51 PM Cornelius Schumacher <schumac...@kde.org> wrote: > On Sonntag, 27. Januar 2019 21:14:10 CET Mirko Boehm wrote: > > > > I need to point out that CC0 licenses are problematic in many > jurisdictions, > > as there is no simple way to dedicate a work to the public domain. The > > correct way in for example France or Germany would be to use a permissive > > FOSS license. Let us avoid the mine field of public domain. > > Isn't the CC0 license the attempt to solve the issues of the term "public > domain" across jurisdictions and provide a license which works as what > people > expect from public domain? > > What are the issues of public domain that CC0 doesn't solve? > > -- > Cornelius Schumacher <schumac...@kde.org> > > >
