---- On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:37:56 -0700 Christian Loosli <[email protected]> 
wrote ---- 
 > That all in mind is why I think the approach was maybe not the best one and  
 > should be reconsidered for future events and articles.  
 >  
 > Thanks and kind regards,  
 >  
 > Christian 


I'm in agreement with Christian about this. Conducting this process behind 
closed doors seems to have backfired, as evidenced by the technical problems 
that happened anyway and the controversy and drama that we're all now embroiled 
in. Regardless of intentions, these results should be a clear sign that the 
process didn't work and needs to be re-examined. And it's very disappointing to 
hear that a part of the reason for this process was specifically to exclude a 
particular person. It's no great secret that Paul and Jonathan don't have a 
great working relationship, but this problem needs to be addressed openly. The 
two of you trying to work around one another, occasionally writing passive 
aggressive emails on the mailing list is not how the problem will get solved; 
instead it will just get bigger over time.

We don't need secrecy, politicking, and personality-driven conflicts like this 
in KDE. When there's a problem, let's handle it like adults so we can all get 
back to the business of making the finest open-source software the world has 
ever seen.

Nate

Reply via email to