Jonathan Riddell ha scritto: > I'm not against this but the downsides are: > -it's yet another licence so would add confusion > -it's incompatible with the GPL 2 so there's an increased risk of incompatible > licences interfering with each other > > It doesn't seem to cover any use case that isn't covered by the other > permissive licences, it's just a bit more explicit about some of the detail. > Can you say why you think it's useful?
I don't have a specific answer; just consistency with other (python) libraries around. It is not compatible with the GPLv2, but it is fully compatible with GPLv3. (moreover, it has a patent promise). -- Luigi
