Thanks again for this very nice update, Carl. Since nobody has raised serious objections, and it is a very welcome improvement, I propose that we move forward with it. We can tweak things as needed.
Nate ---- On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 15:22:08 -0700 Carl Schwan <[email protected]> wrote ---- > Hi, > sorry for the late answer, I was busy with other things. > > I saw multiple problems with the current page: > > + A carousel is a very poor way to represent information. There were multi > studies proving that almost nobody bothers to read the slides > + The explanation about KDE are terrible: I tried sending it to some friend > who are not in the Linux/Open Source scene and nobody could find what > KDE is only from the homepage. The SEO of the homepage is also quite poor. > + The homepage is representing 27% of the visits of kde.org and improving it > could help a lot > + I also want to help improve the image of KDE == community > > Carl > > (sending it again since I replied to Scott only the first time) > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > On Sunday, December 8, 2019 4:27 PM, Scott Petrovic > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This looks pretty good overall Carl. Was there specific problems that this > > redesign is trying to solve? I guess I am trying to get in your mind a > > bit. I am not sure what type of data or feedback we currently get about > > the KDE site...and how this is going to be easier/better for people. That > > helps with decision making a lot -- especially when there are > > disagreements with what to do or not to do. > > > > > In terms of piwik and web analytics, I could go either way. Do we care if > > people are trying to access this on their phone? Are there many people > > trying to view this on a 4K monitor? For this KDE site it might not > > matter, but for applications it can be really important. For example if > > most people that are going to your site have a 1366 x 768 monitor, you > > better make sure your application works well at that screen size.
