Hi,

> On 13. Jan 2020, at 21:18, Johan Ouwerkerk <jm.ouwerk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> - current version of the draft: https://community.kde.org/Policies/ 
>> <https://community.kde.org/Policies/>
>> Licensing_Policy/Draft_SPDX_v2
>> 
> 
> One thing that is not entirely clear to me is what our position would
> be towards e.g. *.license files or DEP5 files as suggested by the
> REUSE spec.

My recommendation is to choose one. The more widely used and recommended option 
is SPDX. There is more tooling emerging around the SPDX format because of that. 
The REUSE specs give a choice, the focus is on “use a common, machine-readable 
format”. I suggest we use SPDX.

Best,

Mirko.
-- 
Mirko Boehm | mi...@kde.org | KDE e.V.
Qt Certified Specialist and Trainer
Request a meeting: https://doodle.com/mirkoboehm

Reply via email to