On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:16 AM Boudewijn Rempt <[email protected]> wrote: > > On woensdag 29 april 2020 18:17:05 CEST Nicolás Alvarez wrote: > > > > My understanding is that there is a workboard per repository *and* another > > per group. > > > > Now, how big do we make the group workboard? All of KDE? A smaller > > category? That is the question. > > Ah, that makes more sense. I guess that there should be groups for > repositories that really fit together, like all the split-up pim stuff, and a > generic holding thing for the projects that are more on their own, like Krita > or Kdenlive. >
Which is why we have proposed the structure that we have, because it allows for module level task boards, allows easy visibility of the merge requests related to the contained repositories, and makes projects contained within that group easy to list. Those projects that are standalone are put into groups based on what they're for (Krita = graphics, Kdenlive = multimedia) for ease of discoverability by those not familiar with them. Cheers, Ben > -- > https://www.valdyas.org | https://www.krita.orgh > > > >
