If I'm understanding things, we have solutions to most or all of the
objections raised so far:
- Projects will be allowed to live in--or at least appear in--multiple
top-level groups (e.g. plasma-framework could appear in both the
Frameworks top-level group and also the Plasma top-level group)
- kdesrc-build and other scripts can be updated to allow people to
easily check out repos using git prefixes (e.g. so that something like
`git clone kde:dolphin` will still work regardlyss of a project's
underlying group)
- cgit will continue to exist for three weeks to provide some transition
time
- Each repo can have its own workboard in addition to the single
group-level workboard
If the above are accurate, then I firmly support the proposal.
As for the actual grouping, I think it makes sense to have top-level
groups for Frameworks, Plasma, PIM, etc. as originally proposed. I can
support putting apps into category-specific groups (e.g. Multimedia,
Office, Graphics, Games, etc) as long as apps could appear in multiple
groups if needed for the case of apps that logically span boundaries
(e.g. repos for PlaMo apps could appear in both the Plasma Mobile
top-level group and also the relevant app group).
Nate
