> But if there are situations where third parties are living off our good name, > we should fight this. We already have the rights to do so.
Should we? Isn't that the same that RedHat, SUSE, Canonical, etc. do? What's wrong with charging for our apps as a distributor? We can, under the GPL, enforce that any fixes made to apps (eg: so they work better on Windows) get back upstream, but that's it. If our apps were trademarked, why is the person doing the Windows packages not allowed to use the app name, but the person doing the Debian packages is? In what they differ? Do we want to become IceWeasel? I think we should be happy there are packagers that distribute our software on Windows, the same way we are happy there are packages distributing our software on Linux distros.
