On Saturday, 20 April 2024 15.50.58 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote: > One thing I'm unsure for instance is: do we want to make Gear -> Plasma > dependencies completely forbidden? > > We might consider this going one step too far. I could understand if a Gear > app wants to provide "more integration" in a Plasma session. So mandatory > Gear -> Plasma dependencies, I agree are to forbid, but optional ones? I'm > less certain.
if such a ban would get in place, imposes to treat even more with care the tendency to put things in plasma instead of doing a proper framework because they are much easier to manage/depend from within plasma (still not convinced at the activities move for instance 🤨) -- Marco Martin
