On Wednesday 15 December 2010 11:37:51 John Layt wrote: > That was always my assumption. Which also makes me confused as to why > promoting from private to public would break BIC, why should any change in a > formerly private symbol break BIC when it is essentially deleting a private > symbol and adding a new public one? Unless that's another MSVC 'feature' > we're working around?
I would guess that the problematic situations are actually protected -> public and when the method is called by an inline method. Alex
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.