On Tuesday, 2010-12-28, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > On Tuesday 28 December 2010 12:56:01 Rodrigo Belém wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Alex Fiestas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 12/28/2010 03:06 PM, Rodrigo Belém wrote: > > >> Hello everybody, > > >> > > >> I've been working on kubuntu team to update the samba file sharing > > >> code and code is already in trunk :-) I have another patch that > > >> updates the kdenetwork/filesharing, but it removes all the nfs code, > > >> which needs root privileges. Are you ok with this change or do you > > >> want keep the nfs support? > > > > > > Well, we should not remove any feature imho, but maybe we can improve > > > it. > > > > > > If the code needs root maybe we can port the current code to KAuth so > > > we have a modern way of doing it. > > > > I think remove features is not very good too, but worth keep nfs > > support and update it? Users really uses this feature? > > Does that mean making KDE completely oblivious to NFS at all?
I think the main idea of this thread is to agree to a change without knowing what it exactly changes. Unfortunately we don't have any of the following things at our disposal: - web based system for reviewing patches (you know like a reviewboard) - messaging system with attachment capabilities (you know like email) - remote file access based ion some universal addressing scheme (you know like HTTP) Since, as we already have established, have neither at our disposal I suggest we jsut go ahead and blindly argue about scope, necessity and any other details people can come up with. Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
