On Thursday, January 20, 2011, Ben Cooksley wrote: > Correct, it is Gerrit which is a more git based alternative to Reviewboard. > http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/
does it have benefits over reviewboard? having just toyed with a bit after lunch today, it seems like it's useful to drive the entire integration workflow and not just smaller or one-off patches? if that's true, would gerrit be a workable replacement for reviewboard once everything is moved over to git? would it be integratable with identify.kde.org? i ask because if that was to become something that might eventually join our toolchain, it might alter how we decide to plan the workflow and the timeline for implementing it in full ... -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
