On Monday 07 February 2011, Andras Mantia wrote: > On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 18:36:28 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > I don't really care how it will be, but I really think we should agree > > on one common recommended and documented workflow to use. > > I agree of having a recommended way of doing, but I do not agree forcing > a predefined workflow on the contributors. As the thread cleary shows, > some use master as base and work there (and used to do it in the past X > years), others work on stable. Forcing a way onto the developers just > becase the tool's result is nicer in that way will not make me happy.
Well, I think a recommendation for those who are not git-masters is important, so a workflow which leads to few conflicts and makes people happy when followed (like a nice history etc.) would be a good thing to have. I don't think it has to be "forced" on people who know what they are doing. Alex
