On 22/03/2011, Ian Monroe <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 18:13, Alex Merry <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 21/03/11 20:17, Alexander Neundorf wrote: >>> >>> On Monday 21 March 2011, Ian Monroe wrote: >>>> >>>> Ben did add this block to his hook. Hooray. :) >>>> >>>> I'm thinking I should just go ahead and rename KDE/4.6 to 4.6 etc. >>> >>> Wasn't the conclusion more like going with the longer name, i.e. KDE/4.6 >>> ? >> >> That's what I understood from the earlier discussion... > > I get why people like the prefix in theory, since I mean that's why I > left it there. It looks nice.
>From what I understand the problem, it's not a like/dislike question but a real problem if an application has its own version numbers and reaches e.g. version 4.6. > But in practice its obviously just been confusing. Even now that > creating 4.6 is blocked, that just means its blocked and we won't > notice when people struggle. Can the hook not give a message pointing to some Wiki page that explains the issue? Regards
