-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100920/#review2106
-----------------------------------------------------------


My thoughts are if the anonymous tickbox is first focus it should be above the 
username/password fields and the username/password fields should be disabled if 
anonymous is selected.  But that may look a little weird with the text to the 
left and the title below it.

Or does entering a username/password automatically de-select the anonymous?  In 
which case this is fine so long as the username field has the cursor focus and 
pressing enter immediately activates the ok button.  

Or perhaps pre-populate username with 'anonymous' and have the word 
pre-selected so it can be overtyped and do away with the tickbox entirely?

Basically what I'm looking for is the easiest shortest most obvious path for 
the main use cases.

</bikeshedding>

- John


On March 22, 2011, 6:04 p.m., Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100920/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 22, 2011, 6:04 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kdelibs.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> The attached patch renames and moves the "Anonymous" box shown in the first 
> screenshot below the password input widgets. This change is done to 
> 
> #1. Remove the checkbox from screwing tab order when you enter 
> username/password.
> #2. Make the purpose of the checkbox less cryptic to the end user.
> 
> Any objections ?
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   kdeui/dialogs/kpassworddialog.ui 2649870 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100920/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Screenshots
> -----------
> 
> Current Password Dialog
>   http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100920/s/106/
> New Password Dialog
>   http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100920/s/107/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dawit
> 
>

Reply via email to