A Dissabte, 26 de març de 2011, Albert Astals Cid va escriure: > A Dissabte, 26 de març de 2011, Gilles Caulier va escriure: > > 2011/3/26 Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]>: > > > A Dissabte, 26 de març de 2011, vàreu escriure: > > >> 2011/3/26 Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]>: > > >> > A Dissabte, 26 de març de 2011, Gilles Caulier va escriure: > > >> >> Albert, > > >> >> > > >> >> If you look on my commit comment, it's explained. > > >> >> > > >> >> https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/graphics/digikam/digika > > >> >> m- sof twa > > >> >> re-compilation/repository/revisions/ce696373b95a2bb5d8ec4760c5061e1 > > >> >> 7e f6 0226 6 > > >> >> > > >> >> In fact, it's temporally. I request a project creation into > > >> >> kdereview for libkmediawiki. So i wait it: > > >> >> > > >> >> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=269220 > > >> > > > >> > So you could not wait 1 day and had to copy the code around? > > >> > > >> Request have been posted Thursday morning... > > >> > > >> > Thanks for being patient, BTW will you come to l10n and clean the > > >> > mess you've created? > > >> > > >> Which mess. > > > > > > The mess that we have two libmediakiwi.pot (one in silk, one in > > > kipi-plugins) around and translators are complaining to me because > > > that's not correct. > > > > no. there is no libmediawiki copied in kipi-plugins. > > And what is this https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/graphics/kipi- > plugins/repository/revisions/master/show/mediawiki ?
Sorry, i just realized i was complaining about the wrong thing. What i should be complaining about is kipi-plugin_mediawiki that is duplicate in both silk and kipi-plugins. Albert > > Albert
