-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101013/#review2681
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


No problem, then please commit as is.

- Christoph


On April 2, 2011, 11:47 p.m., Parker Coates wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101013/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 2, 2011, 11:47 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kdelibs.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> This patch attempts to improve the usefulness and usability of KFileDialog's 
> filter field when in Opening mode.
> 
> Firstly, if the filter text isn't: * the display name of one of the filters 
> passed to the dialog or
>                                    * one or more space separated mimetype 
> specifiers (containing a '/')  or
>                                    * one or more space separated file globs 
> (containing '*', '?' or "[.*]")
> we convert the text to a glob by prepending and appending asterisks. This 
> lets the user enter a piece of text (without having to know any glob 
> patterns) and see only the files whose names contain that text, much the same 
> as they would when filtering in Dolphin.
> 
> Secondly, the filtering updates on the fly as the filter text is typed. 
> Previously, the filtering updated only when Return was pressed, which differs 
> from the behaviour of most of KDE's other filter boxes. The old behaviour is 
> especially confusing when one clicks the small clear button embedded in the 
> combobox, because it clears the box, but the filtering is unchanged until the 
> user goes to the keyboard to press enter.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug 142900.
>     http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142900
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   kfile/kfilewidget.cpp 9b8cdeb 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101013/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I've played around with it a fair bit and it seems to work fine. I've never 
> really worked with this code before, so if I'm doing something silly please 
> let me know.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Parker
> 
>

Reply via email to