On Tuesday 26 April 2011 15.52.18 John Layt wrote: > Hi, > > Did anything come out from discussions on feature branch naming in git? > With GSoC starting soon we'll be getting a lot of new feature branches and > it would be nice if they were consistantly named to make them easy to find > and manage. > > See > http://community.kde.org/20110213_GitWorkflowAgenda#How_To_Handle_Topic_Bran > ches for the original meeting notes. > > I'd prefer to see the gsoc branches under a common prefix in the main > project repo rather than as personal branches or repos: > > origin/gsoc2011/<subproject>/<branchname>
Why this long name with multiple namespaces, the branches should be deleted once merged so we won't have a collection of old soc branches around for long? /Regards Torgny