-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/758/#review10092
-----------------------------------------------------------



trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kfile/kdirselectdialog.cpp
<http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/758/#comment11341>

    Switch order of initialization



trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kfile/kdirselectdialog.cpp
<http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/758/#comment11342>

    Q_UNUSED(index)


- Sergio


On Sept. 5, 2010, 6:05 a.m., Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/758/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 5, 2010, 6:05 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kdelibs.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Currently, there is no way to resize the places view in a KDirSelectDialog. 
> Sometimes the default width is too small, and I can't see the directory names.
> 
> Most of the code in this patch was taken from KFileWidget - a QSplitter is 
> inserted between the places view and the directory tree view, its width is 
> read/written using KConfigGroup and it's not automatically resized when the 
> whole dialog is resized.
> 
> The drawback is that modifications to code in KFileWidget may require 
> identical modifications to KDirSelectDialog too. Perhaps the best option 
> would be to refactor this functionality somewhere else, but the work required 
> would be much bigger.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug 249476.
>     https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=249476
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kfile/kdirselectdialog.h 1171225 
>   trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kfile/kdirselectdialog.cpp 1171762 
> 
> Diff: http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/758/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Both Ark (in its Extraction Dialog) and Plasma's Desktop Settings (when 
> adding a folder for slideshow wallpapers) now have a QSplitter that works as 
> expected.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Raphael
> 
>

Reply via email to