Hi, On Friday 18 March 2011, John Layt wrote: > Hi, > > We still have some outstanding issues from the Git Workflow meeting a while > back (see http://community.kde.org/20110213_GitWorkflowAgenda) which I'd > like to see updated. > > * Workflow > eean, steveire and PovAddict were to draw up alternative workflow > proposals, steveire has drawn up one at > http://community.kde.org/20110213_GitWorkflowAgenda/StevesIdea (see earlier > thread). Do we have the other proposals yet? What needs doing to move > this forward?
Any progress here ? AFAIK we still haven't decided on aynthing and have zero documentation. I thought the ability to have better workflows with git was one of the motivations for the move to git. Why aren't these better workflows documented or recommended anywhere ? > * Release branch naming, KDE/4.6 vs 4.6 > This was decided by a coin toss to be 4.6 rather than KDE/4.6, but I > suspect by now more people have stable branches from kdelibs/kdebase than > the other modules so it may be less disruptive overall to use KDE/4.6? Did we come to a conclusion about this in the latest thread ? If so, which was it ? This is also completely undocumented. Git gurus, *please* work on that. > Either way, there's still a couple of outstanding actions: > ** Sysadmins to rename the branches that use the losing naming scheme if > that's possible without too much disruption > ** Sysadmins to block creating new branches for the losing naming scheme. > > * Documentation > I've started the Git documentation: > http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Git > http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Git/Configuration I moved the "Creating a patch" link from "To be reviewed" to the "official" tutorials section, since I think it looks good and is not outdated. I also added a simple step-by-step howto for getting started there. Please review it, maybe it should be merged into the Git Configuration page. Alex
