A Tuesday, June 07, 2011, Kevin Ottens va escriure: > On Tuesday 7 June 2011 01:26:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > A Tuesday, June 07, 2011, Kevin Ottens va escriure: > > > Well, obviously a Tier 1 framework would have to use tr() instead of > > > i18n() for its translation needs. > > > > Are we still going to use .po or you plan on us moving to Qt translation > > files? > > Well, I honestly don't know what awesome magic you used for libsolid, so > for me it's "the same recipe". Note that it'll happen mostly for Tier 1 > frameworks though.
Unfortunately that is not possible. Right now Solid is translated using .po but that only works in KDE applications because you have a KGlobal+KLocale around that loads .mo files (compiled .po), hijacks Qt calls and maps them to the .mo contents. Without a KGlobal+KLocale around that will not work. This means that if you want Tier 1 frameworks to be translatable you need either to teach Qt to understand gettext files natively or to make Tier 1 frameworks use pure based Qt/Linguist solutions which does not fit either in what scripty is able to do neither in what our translators are used to. Albert