On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:20 AM, todd rme <toddrme2...@gmail.com> wrote: > I gather from the discussion that most, if not all, the features that > KDM still needs are also lacking in LightDM, while KDM has lots of > features LightDM does not. So if we are talking about wasted > resources,
>wouldn't it waste far fewer resources Ex.act.ly. That's precisely what I've been trying to get across this entire time. But instead of adding anything missing to KDM, it's instead added to a different, far less developed project. > to add those new > features and add the Gnome-centric bits in KDM than to add the new > features, old features, gnome-centric bits, and KDE-centric bits in > LightDM? -- Shaun Reich, KDE Software Developer (kde.org)
