On Wednesday 06 July 2011 23:01:13 Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em Wednesday, 6 de July de 2011, às 22:54:39, David Jarvie escreveu: > > I've added a comment to the merge request suggesting that instead of a > > reference date/time, the units in which the time span was specified should > > be stored in the class. That way, daylight time changes could be catered > > for easily (by external classes), and also time spans of months or years > > would work intuitively when applied to any start date. Basically, I think > > that the class has taken the wrong approach, and could be made much more > > generally useful with a simple change in the way it does things. > > I think the class is fine. It was supposed to be a glorified way of storing a > qint64 milliseconds and converting from that to a count of days, hours, > minutes and seconds. > > This class was added so that people could format their timespans.
With a slightly different approach, it could be more versatile, and still fulfil its current aims as well. -- David Jarvie. KDE developer. KAlarm author -- http://www.astrojar.org.uk/kalarm
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
