On Monday, 8 de August de 2011 14:25:13 David Faure wrote: > And since I just fixed the crash (missing wait() after terminate(), see > commit log), I don't think we need this change. However reusing threads > might be a good idea (separate issue).
This could probably use a redesign. If this class only handles requests coming
from the ioslave, why does it need to be blocking? Can't it be non-blocking
and send the result back later?
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
