> On Aug. 8, 2011, 10:51 p.m., David Jarvie wrote:
> > If the proposed patch is unacceptable, I suggest adding a new method
> > 
> > static void allowWindowModal(bool allow);
> > 
> > If called with true, this would enable the behaviour described in the 
> > apidocs for subsequent KMessageBox instances. By default, or if called with 
> > false, all KMessageBox instances would behave as now. As I said in an 
> > earlier comment, being able only to display application modal instances 
> > just isn't acceptable in some cases.

What about extending the Option enum instead?


- Thomas


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102246/#review5525
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 7, 2011, 3:18 p.m., David Jarvie wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102246/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 7, 2011, 3:18 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kdelibs.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> According to the apidocs, KMessageBox instances with a parent widget 
> specified are supposed to be window modal, not application modal. This patch 
> fixes this.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   kdeui/dialogs/kmessagebox.cpp 939be89 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102246/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested warningYesNo(), questionYesNoCancel() with a parent widget - widgets 
> in a different window tree were still able to be used.
> 
> kmessageboxtest runs ok.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David
> 
>

Reply via email to