On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Lukas Appelhans <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey! > > Cool... I see you go for a split up of kdenetwork (makes sense imo). > > The problem I see at the moment you have to build all applications together in > kdenetwork, otherwise they fail to compile. So this is a first thing which > needs to change.
It is not really required to build them all together. I used to have git-svn clones of krdc, krfb and kopete and built them separately. Actually, all the work I have done on krfb was done this way. Iirc there is extra cmake code in there to ensure that they build both standalone and all together. > What is missing are tags and branches right? > > Lukas > > PS: The KGet "svn cp" comment is (I guess) about this branch: > http://websvn.kde.org/branches/work/make_kget_cool/?pathrev=647221 > As far as I know this is the KGet2 rewrite and was copied to trunk then... > >> I have partially written the rules for kdenetwork, but they are not >> complete. I don't have time to work on them at the moment, so someone >> else taking that over would be good if it's going to happen any time >> soon. The work I've done so far is in the git repository with all the >> other conversion rules. >> >> -- >> George
