On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 01:42:47PM +0300, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > In other words, before changing something so it needs porting, people > really should look at the real, actual codebase of a couple of big > projects that might be affected. > it doesn't matter how many TLOC are affected if the change is fully automatable. in fact, for qt5 we defined "source compatible" to mean "porting can be fully automated".
- Proposal to use QIcon in APIs in KF5. Stephen Kelly
- Re: Proposal to use QIcon in APIs in KF5. Albert Astals Cid
- Re: Proposal to use QIcon in APIs in KF5. John Layt
- Re: Proposal to use QIcon in APIs in KF5. Michael Pyne
- Re: Proposal to use QIcon in APIs in K... Alexander Neundorf
- Re: Proposal to use QIcon in APIs in KF5. Boudewijn Rempt
- Re: Proposal to use QIcon in APIs in K... Tomaz Canabrava
- Re: Proposal to use QIcon in APIs... Andreas Pakulat
- Re: Proposal to use QIcon in APIs in K... Olivier Goffart
- Re: Proposal to use QIcon in APIs... Boudewijn Rempt
- Re: Proposal to use QIcon in ... Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: Proposal to use QIcon... Michael Pyne
- Re: Proposal to use QIcon... Boudewijn Rempt
- Re: Proposal to use QIcon... Jaime
- Re: Proposal to use QIcon... todd rme
- Re: Proposal to use QIcon... Aaron J. Seigo
- Re: Proposal to use QIcon... todd rme
- Re: Proposal to use QIcon... Aaron J. Seigo
- Re: Proposal to use QIcon... Alexander Neundorf
- Re: Proposal to use QIcon... Kevin Ottens
- Re: Proposal to use QIcon... Alexander Neundorf
