On Thursday 15 September 2011 17:44:20 Stephen Kelly wrote: > Does that mean that nepomuk should be removed from the frameworks branch? I > had a look, and I'm not sure if the history is kept etc.
In any case I wouldn't remove it, from the Frameworks effort POV it just means we don't have to bother about Nepomuk. Either way we shouldn't remove it from the kdelibs repo because if the new repo got done properly the plan was to use git grafts to get the full history for the splitted repos, and if wasn't done properly, then it's likely that the nepomuk lords will be happy to find the old history from the kdelibs repo somehow. > Removing it from frameworks would mean that it doesn't get updated as things > change, but changing nepomuk things in the frameworks branch wouldn't be > mergable anyway. I'd say we should just comment it out from the build right away (depends how many other libs depend on it though). Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
