A Dijous, 29 de setembre de 2011, Scott Kitterman vàreu escriure: > On Thursday, September 29, 2011 11:47:22 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > A Dijous, 29 de setembre de 2011, Scott Kitterman vàreu escriure: > > > On Thursday, September 29, 2011 08:01:00 PM Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > > On Thursday 29 September 2011, Heinz Wiesinger wrote: > > > > > From what I remember from the desktop summit the picture you > > > > > draw > > > > > here > > > > > is > > > > > quite an exaggeration of what is actually happening. > > > > > > > > > > kdelibs 4.7 is meant to be frozen for new features, but not > > > > > for > > > > > bugfixes. > > > > > Bugfix releases of kdelibs-4.7 happenend and I'm sure will > > > > > continue > > > > > on > > > > > happening. As for the versioning I don't see why one of > > > > > those > > > > > bugfix > > > > > releases couldn't be rebranded as 4.8.0 if that makes things > > > > > easier > > > > > (that > > > > > was even briefly mentioned at the release team BoF). It does > > > > > not > > > > > solve > > > > > feature backports of course. > > > > > > > > But one of my points is that we need features too, not just > > > > bugfixes. > > > > Continuing 4.7.x releases solves the problem of bugfixes just > > > > fine, > > > > but > > > > entirely fails to address the issue of features. > > > > > > Even worse, features have already creeped into the 4.7 branch > > > because > > > they are needed and there's no 4.8 branch, so this isn't a > > > theorectical > > > point. > > > > Why is that bad, that is what was agreed when the freeze took place. > > Agreed on by who?
Read this list "Plan to transition to KDE Frameworks". Albert