A Divendres, 30 de setembre de 2011, Sebastian Trüg vàreu escriure: > of course this is for the frameworks thingi.
Oh, sorry for the misinterpretation. Albert > > On 09/30/2011 07:09 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote: > > On 2011-09-30, Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> wrote: > >> A Divendres, 30 de setembre de 2011, Sebastian Trüg vàreu escriure: > >>> Hi lists, > >>> > >>> with frameworks in the building and Nepomuk probably going that > >>> direction already for 4.8 I would like to clean up a bit. One of > >>> these > >>> cleanup tasks targets the Soprano::Model statement signals. So far > >>> these were the only way to get informed about changes in Nepomuk - > >>> with a very bad impact on performance and bad usability. > >>> With 4.7 we already introduced a preliminary version of the > >>> Nepomuk::ResourceWatcher[1] which is now in charge of informing > >>> clients > >>> about changes. > >>> I would like to anyone using the "old" API to change to the new > >>> ResourceWatcher as soon as possible because I would like to disable > >>> the > >>> old signals soon. They simply entail to many problems and clutter > >>> the API.>> > >> Removing signals of what seems to be an existing public class/daemon > >> is a very bad idea and you should wait until 5.0. > > > > Full ack. > > > > /Sune
